Blog / Templates
Not legal advice. This article is a preliminary technical guide for AI SaaS teams. Always confirm classification and obligations with qualified counsel. Effective dates reflect the Digital Omnibus updates as of July 2026.
Lawyers and enterprise security teams ask the same questions every time: What does the AI do? Who is affected? Which model? Who oversees outputs? What is your role under the AI Act?
A system card is the one-page answer. It is not a conformity assessment and not a legal opinion. It is the intake form that stops counsel from reconstructing your product from marketing copy.
Art. 50 transparency still lands earlier (2 August 2026) — the card should note whether users interact with AI and how you disclose.
| Field | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Intended purpose | Classification and Art. 6 analysis start here |
| Provider vs deployer | Role drives obligations |
| Output nature | Determines / ranks / preparatory / assistive |
| Material influence | High-risk signal for Annex III use cases |
| Profiling | Links to GDPR Art. 22 and diligence questions |
| Models / vendors | GPAI vs your own system; data flows |
| Human oversight | Art. 14 signal if high-risk; buyer trust always |
| Logging | Legal if high-risk (Art. 12); recommended otherwise |
| Open legal questions | What counsel must still decide |
Use the ready table: AI system card template.
Pair it with:
Once the card is filled, get a free readiness brief for your product. The brief adds confidence labels, sources, and effective dates so counsel spends time on judgment — not archaeology.
Not legal advice. A system card is a readiness artefact, not proof of compliance.
Get a free readiness brief for your product — not a commodity risk label.
Get a free readiness brief for your product