AI agents — systems that autonomously take actions, make decisions, and interact with external tools — are a growing category in SaaS. And they present unique compliance challenges under the EU AI Act.
Traditional AI SaaS: user submits data → AI processes → user reviews output.
AI agents: user delegates task → agent plans → agent takes actions → agent reports back.
The key differences:
Agents must disclose they are AI — but when an agent sends an email on behalf of a user, who discloses? The agent builder? The user?
Best practice: Include AI signature in all outbound communications from agents. "Sent with AI assistance by [Product Name]."
If your agent performs actions that could affect individuals (ranking candidates, updating credit scores, modifying contracts), you need human-in-the-loop or human-on-the-loop.
For agent builders: Implement confirmation steps before high-impact actions. Log every action with human review status.
Agents should log:
Most agents fall into limited risk (transparency only). But:
| Action | Priority | Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| Add AI disclosure to agent outputs | High | This week |
| Implement action logging | High | This month |
| Add human review for high-impact actions | High | This month |
| Document tool/data access | Medium | This quarter |
| Review agent autonomy levels | Medium | Ongoing |
When (not if) regulators review AI agents, they will ask:
AI agents are new enough that most regulators haven't issued specific guidance. Use this window to build compliance into your architecture, not bolt it on later.
Run a free AI Act readiness scan. Get your risk score in 2 minutes.
→ Get your free risk score